OpenAI revises ChatGPT crawler documentation with significant policy changes
OpenAI modified technical specifications for ChatGPT-User crawler, removing robots.txt compliance language and clarifying OAI-SearchBot usage no longer includes training data collection.
OpenAI updated the documentation for its ChatGPT crawler system on December 9, 2025, making several significant changes to how the company describes the roles and behaviors of its web crawlers and user agents. According to Pieter Serraris, a digital marketing consultant who spotted the changes, the modifications fundamentally alter the relationship between website owners and OpenAI's automated systems.
The most consequential change involves ChatGPT-User, the crawler that executes user-initiated actions within ChatGPT. OpenAI removed language indicating this crawler would comply with robots.txt rules. The previous documentation stated that "the following robots.txt tags" applied to all three user agents, but the updated version specifies only "OAI SearchBot and GPTBot robots.txt tags." This modification effectively means ChatGPT-User will ignore robots.txt directives that website owners use to control crawler access.
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one
OpenAI justified this change by emphasizing user initiation. "Because these actions are initiated by a user, robots.txt rules may not apply," according to the updated documentation. This reasoning positions ChatGPT-User as a proxy for human browsing rather than an autonomous crawler, distinguishing it from traditional web scraping operations that website owners typically regulate through robots.txt files.
The documentation changes also clarified that OAI-SearchBot no longer functions to feed navigational links in ChatGPT answers. Previous versions suggested blocking this bot would prevent websites from appearing in ChatGPT results, but the updated language removes this connection. Websites can now block OAI-SearchBot without necessarily excluding themselves from ChatGPT's search features, though the exact mechanisms for link inclusion remain unclear in the revised documentation.
OpenAI expanded the described functionality of ChatGPT-User to include Custom GPT requests and GPT Actions. This broadens the scope of activities that the crawler performs beyond basic user queries, encompassing more complex interactions within OpenAI's ecosystem. The change reflects the platform's expanded capabilities since ChatGPT reached top 10 global websites as search features expanded across different user tiers throughout 2025.
A technical detail in the updated documentation reveals that OAI-SearchBot and GPTBot share information with each other. "If your site has allowed both bots, we may use the results from just one crawl for both use cases to avoid duplicate crawling," according to the new specifications. Serraris noted this confirms patterns that website operators have observed in server logs: multiple OpenAI bots sometimes visit sites for individual prompts, suggesting coordination between the crawlers to optimize data collection.
The documentation stripped language indicating OAI-SearchBot was used for links and to train OpenAI's generative AI foundation models. According to a comparison published by Search Engine Roundtable, the previous description stated OAI-SearchBot was used to "link to and surface websites in search results in ChatGPT's search features." It also noted that sites "opted out of OAI-SearchBot will not be used to crawl content to train OpenAI's generative AI foundation models shown in ChatGPT search answers, though can still appear as navigational links in our site."
The revised version removes this training language entirely. The updated description states: "OAI-SearchBot is for search. OAI-SearchBot is used to surface websites in search results in ChatGPT's search features. It is Sites that are opted out of OAI-SearchBot will not be used to train OpenAI's generative AI foundation models." This represents a more straightforward separation between search functionality and training data collection, addressing publisher concerns about content usage.
For marketing professionals, these changes create several implications regarding content visibility and data governance. The elimination of robots.txt compliance for ChatGPT-User means traditional web crawler control mechanisms no longer apply to user-initiated actions through ChatGPT. Website owners who rely exclusively on robots.txt files to manage AI access will find this protection ineffective against ChatGPT-User traffic.
The documentation updates arrive amid increasing publisher resistance to AI crawlers. Data from August 2024 showed 35.7% of the world's top 1000 websites blocking OpenAI's GPTBot, representing a seven-fold increase from the 5% blocking rate when the crawler launched in August 2023. Major news publishers including The New York Times, The Guardian, CNN, Reuters, The Washington Post, and Bloomberg have implemented blocks against multiple OpenAI crawlers.
The timing of these documentation changes coincides with broader industry developments around AI crawler management. Cloudflare launched Robotcop on December 10, 2024, providing network-level enforcement of robots.txt policies through Web Application Firewall rules. This infrastructure-level approach addresses the limitations of voluntary compliance that OpenAI's ChatGPT-User changes highlight. Website owners using Cloudflare can now actively prevent policy violations at the network edge rather than relying on crawlers to respect robots.txt directives.
The economic context for these changes reflects fundamental shifts in content monetization. AI crawling data reveals massive imbalances in training versus referral patterns, with Cloudflare research showing AI platforms consume content at unprecedented scales while providing minimal traffic returns. OpenAI's crawl-to-refer ratio declined 10.4% from January to July 2025, showing modest improvement compared to other platforms, but still indicating substantial imbalances between content consumption and traffic generation.
Technical implementation of the crawler changes involves complex interactions between multiple OpenAI systems. GPTBot continues to collect training data for language models, with its market share increasing from 4.7% to 11.7% of AI crawling traffic between July 2024 and July 2025. OAI-SearchBot focuses on search functionality, though the removal of training language suggests clearer separation between these purposes. ChatGPT-User executes user-initiated actions, including Custom GPT requests and GPT Actions, operating as a proxy for human browsing rather than autonomous crawling.
The robots.txt compliance changes raise questions about the distinction between automated systems and user-initiated actions. Traditional web architecture assumed clear boundaries between these categories, with robots.txt providing control over automated crawlers while user-initiated browsing remained unrestricted. OpenAI's positioning of ChatGPT-User blurs these boundaries, as the system performs automated tasks on behalf of users without respecting crawler control mechanisms that website owners implement.
Legal and technical frameworks for managing this ambiguity remain undeveloped. The Robots Exclusion Protocol became an official internet standard in 2022 as RFC9309 after nearly three decades of unofficial use, but the specification predates the current generation of AI systems. Google outlined pathways for robots.txt protocol evolution in March 2025, noting that changes require consensus across the ecosystem rather than unilateral implementation by individual companies.
OpenAI's documentation updates demonstrate how major platforms can redefine crawler behavior through policy changes rather than technical protocol modifications. By removing robots.txt compliance language for ChatGPT-User while maintaining it for other crawlers, OpenAI establishes different standards for different types of automated activity. Website owners seeking to control access must now implement more sophisticated solutions than traditional robots.txt files.
Infrastructure providers have responded to these challenges by developing payment frameworks for AI access. IAB Tech Lab launched a Content Monetization Protocols working group on August 20, 2025, creating standardized approaches for charging AI operators when their bots access publisher content. The initiative followed successful early implementations by infrastructure providers including Cloudflare, which launched pay-per-crawl services in July 2025.
The practical impact on website operators varies depending on their traffic patterns and content strategies. Sites that allowed OAI-SearchBot for visibility in ChatGPT search results must now accept ChatGPT-User traffic without robots.txt controls. Sites that blocked OAI-SearchBot may still appear in ChatGPT results through other mechanisms, though the specific pathways for link inclusion remain unclear in the updated documentation. Sites concerned about training data collection can block GPTBot separately from search-related crawlers.
Monitoring tools provide visibility into these crawler interactions. Website operators can track visits from OpenAI's various crawlers through server logs, analytics platforms, and specialized services like Cloudflare's AI Audit dashboard. These systems identify crawler traffic, analyze access patterns, and help administrators understand which OpenAI systems interact with their content and for what purposes.
Buy ads on PPC Land. PPC Land has standard and native ad formats via major DSPs and ad platforms like Google Ads. Via an auction CPM, you can reach industry professionals.
The documentation changes reflect OpenAI's broader strategic positioning as ChatGPT expands search capabilities. The company made search features available to all logged-in free users globally in December 2024, significantly expanding the potential user base initiating ChatGPT-User traffic. ChatGPT shopping features expanded to German users in April 2025, requiring merchant websites to allow OAI-SearchBot access for inclusion in shopping results.
The technical requirements for managing OpenAI crawler access now involve multiple decision points. Website owners must separately consider GPTBot for training data collection, OAI-SearchBot for search functionality, and ChatGPT-User for user-initiated actions. Each crawler serves distinct purposes with different robots.txt compliance behaviors, requiring granular configuration of access policies rather than blanket allow or deny decisions.
Alternative access control methods beyond robots.txt include authentication requirements, rate limiting, geographic restrictions, and infrastructure-level blocking through services like Cloudflare. These approaches address limitations of voluntary compliance by implementing technical barriers that crawlers cannot bypass through policy reinterpretation. However, they also affect legitimate users and may impact website functionality for non-crawler traffic.
The competitive dynamics in AI search influence these crawler policy decisions. OpenAI faces competition from Google's AI-powered search features, Meta's AI initiatives, and specialized platforms like Perplexity. Each company implements different approaches to content access, creating fragmented standards that website owners must navigate. The lack of industry consensus on appropriate crawler behavior complicates policy development for all stakeholders.
Publisher perspectives on these changes remain mixed. Some view the clarification of OAI-SearchBot's role as positive, separating search functionality from training data collection more clearly than previous documentation. Others express concern about ChatGPT-User's robots.txt exemption, seeing it as circumventing established web standards through semantic reframing. The effectiveness of these policy changes in building publisher trust will likely emerge through industry adoption patterns and legal challenges over coming months.
The documentation updates also affect Common Crawl operations, which supplies training data to major AI companies including OpenAI. Common Crawl's CCBot has become the most widely blocked scraper among top 1,000 websites, surpassing even OpenAI's GPTBot. The relationship between OpenAI's direct crawlers and Common Crawl's indirect data provision creates complex pathways for content access that website-level controls may not fully address.
Content creators face strategic decisions about balancing visibility against data protection. Allowing crawler access increases potential discovery through ChatGPT search while enabling data collection for various purposes. Blocking crawlers reduces unauthorized data usage but may limit platform visibility. The optimal approach depends on individual business models, content types, and competitive considerations that vary across organizations.
OpenAI's position as both a consumer-facing platform and an enterprise API provider adds complexity to these considerations. The company processes over 1 billion weekly searches through ChatGPT, representing significant potential referral traffic for websites that appear in results. However, actual referral patterns show substantial imbalances, with ChatGPT referrals increasing 25x while still remaining far below traditional search engine traffic volumes.
The technical architecture supporting these crawlers involves distributed systems operating across multiple datacenters. Like Google's crawling infrastructure, OpenAI likely distributes crawling across numerous IP addresses to optimize performance and bandwidth usage. Website operators may observe visits from multiple IP addresses for individual operations, complicating traffic analysis and access control implementation.
Verification of OpenAI crawler authenticity remains important for security. Malicious actors can spoof crawler user agents to bypass access restrictions or conduct unauthorized data collection. Most leading AI crawlers appear on Cloudflare's verified bots list, confirming their IP addresses match published ranges. However, adoption of newer verification standards like WebBotAuth, which uses cryptographic signatures, remains limited among AI operators including OpenAI.
The December 9, 2025 documentation changes represent OpenAI's latest position in ongoing negotiations between content publishers and AI companies. Previous iterations of this documentation have evolved as the company balanced publisher concerns, user functionality, and competitive positioning. Future changes will likely continue reflecting these tensions as industry standards, legal frameworks, and technical capabilities develop.
For digital advertising professionals, these crawler policy changes affect content strategy, traffic attribution, and platform optimization. Websites optimized for traditional search engines must now consider AI-powered alternatives with different content access patterns and referral behaviors. The shift from crawler-based indexing to user-initiated retrieval changes how content reaches audiences and generates value for publishers.
The practical implications extend to SEO strategy, where traditional optimization techniques assume crawler-based indexing with predictable referral patterns. AI-powered search introduces different dynamics, where content appears in synthesized responses rather than traditional result lists. This fundamental architectural difference changes how publishers think about content visibility, attribution, and monetization in AI-mediated discovery environments.
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one
Timeline
- August 2023: OpenAI introduces GPTBot crawler, initially blocked by 5% of top 1000 websites
- June 2024: Cloudflare introduces feature to block AI scrapers and crawlers
- July 2024: OpenAI announces SearchGPT and introduces OAI-SearchBot crawler
- August 2024: 35.7% of top 1000 websites block GPTBot, seven-fold increase from 2023
- September 2024: Cloudflare launches AI Audit tools for publisher control over AI scraping
- December 2024: OpenAI makes search features available to all logged-in free users globally
- December 10, 2024: Cloudflare introduces Robotcop for network-level robots.txt enforcement
- February 2025: ChatGPT reaches top 10 global websites as search features expand
- March 2025: Google outlines robots.txt protocol evolution pathway
- April 2025: ChatGPT shopping features expand to German users
- June 2025: OpenAI upgrades ChatGPT search capabilities with enhanced response quality
- August 2025: IAB Tech Lab launches Content Monetization Protocols working group
- September 2025: AI crawling data reveals massive imbalances in training versus referral patterns
- November 2025: Common Crawl supplies paywalled content to AI companies despite publisher objections
- December 9, 2025: OpenAI updates ChatGPT crawler documentation with significant policy changes
Subscribe PPC Land newsletter ✉️ for similar stories like this one
Summary
Who: OpenAI updated documentation affecting website owners, content publishers, digital marketers, and users of ChatGPT's search capabilities. Pieter Serraris, a digital marketing consultant, identified the changes and shared them on LinkedIn.
What: OpenAI modified technical specifications for three crawlers: ChatGPT-User no longer complies with robots.txt rules for user-initiated actions, OAI-SearchBot no longer described as feeding navigational links or training AI models, and both OAI-SearchBot and GPTBot share information to avoid duplicate crawling. ChatGPT-User now explicitly handles Custom GPT requests and GPT Actions.
When: The documentation changes were published on December 9, 2025, representing the latest iteration of OpenAI's crawler policies that have evolved since GPTBot's introduction in August 2023.
Where: The changes apply globally to all websites interacting with OpenAI's ChatGPT platform and affect crawler behavior across OpenAI's infrastructure systems.
Why: OpenAI positioned ChatGPT-User as a proxy for user browsing rather than autonomous crawling, justifying robots.txt exemption through user initiation. The company separated search functionality from training data collection more clearly while acknowledging crawler coordination to optimize operations. The changes balance publisher concerns, user functionality, and competitive positioning in AI-powered search.