Awin Group confirmed yesterday that PayPal's Honey browser extension violated publisher policies following a formal investigation into allegations of systematic affiliate commission diversion. The affiliate network suspended Honey's payments and access to new advertiser programs on January 21, 2026, according to a statement from CEO Adam Ross.

The investigation, launched immediately after public allegations emerged in December 2024, verified that Honey's browser extension practices breached Awin's publisher policies. Honey acknowledged the impact and agreed to work with Awin on remediation initiatives while implementing initial updates to address identified behavior, according to the statement published on Awin's website.

"Transparency and trust matter, especially when our industry is under scrutiny," Ross wrote in a LinkedIn post announcing the enforcement action. The statement marks the first major affiliate network response confirming specific policy violations following revelations about Honey's commission diversion practices exposed by tech journalist MegaLag on December 22, 2024.

Awin Group comprises Awin and Commission Factory, operating as one of the affiliate marketing industry's largest networks. The protective measures implemented include suspending payments to Honey and blocking the extension's access to new advertiser programs. "As of today, these measures remain in place," according to the statement.

The enforcement action follows similar decisions by other major affiliate networks. Impact.com suspended Honey on January 16, 2026 for what researcher Ben Edelman characterized as "stand-down violations - and concealment from testers." Rakuten Advertising terminated Honey from its network on January 12, 2026, severing access to approximately 2,000 retail merchants including Walmart.

Awin's proprietary Soft Click technology has been active on Honey and most browser extensions throughout the period under investigation, according to the statement. This technology "materially reduces the risk of misattribution of publisher value (or commission) and limits direct harm to publishers and creators," the network explained. While noting that Soft Click "does not make the identified behavior acceptable," Awin stated the technology allowed the company to manage risk responsibly while establishing facts and determining appropriate remedies.

The technical mitigation represents a significant difference from other affiliate networks' exposure to Honey's practices. Soft Click functions as an attribution protection mechanism that appears to have limited commission diversion during the investigation period. The technology operates continuously across browser extensions and subnetwork publishers in Awin's ecosystem, providing baseline fraud prevention beyond standard compliance monitoring.

Honey has committed to funding and supporting several remediation initiatives as part of the path forward, according to Awin's statement. These include providing affiliate networks or mutually agreed third parties with access to relevant source code for verification purposes. The extension also agreed to implement policies enabling advertisers to manage coupon codes, including removal of unauthorized or invalid codes.

The browser extension committed to ongoing cooperation with networks and wider industry compliance teams, including advance notification of material changes to attribution or stand-down logic. Stand-down protocols represent standard practices where browser extensions temporarily halt commission diversion when detecting testing by affiliate networks or compliance monitors.

The December 30, 2025 investigation exposed what researchers characterized as a "selective standdown" system that allegedly adjusted Honey's behavior based on sophisticated user profiling. The system analyzed whether users were logged into affiliate network websites, specific cookies in browsers, email addresses containing "test," account age, cashback points accumulated, and login status to determine whether someone represented a legitimate shopper or compliance tester.

Awin requested that Honey finalize remediation measures and commit to meaningful support as soon as practically possible. The statement emphasized that strong enforcement coupled with constructive industry collaboration is essential to restoring trust and supporting long-term growth in the affiliate ecosystem.

Industry response has been varied. Benjamin Völk, a strategy and growth consultant, stated in response to Ross's LinkedIn announcement: "I'm disappointed by this response. What's being discussed here is not a grey area or a 'difference in interpretation', it is a credible allegation of fraud." Völk argued that partners have been removed from platforms for far less in the past, creating what he characterized as "an unavoidable impression: that compliance stops being uncompromising once enough money is involved."

The critique reflects broader frustrations within the affiliate marketing community about enforcement consistency. Content creators filed a class action lawsuit on December 29, 2024, seeking damages exceeding $5 million. The complaint alleges that Honey's browser extension replaced content creators' affiliate tracking cookies with PayPal's own affiliate identifiers during checkout processes, even when providing no discount codes to consumers.

A second amended complaint filed January 5, 2026 expanded the lawsuit to ten named plaintiffs and included specific merchant contract terms documenting exact commission percentages and qualifying link definitions that Honey allegedly violated. The 101-page filing provides extensive technical documentation of how the extension allegedly used browser permissions to replace affiliate marketers' cookies with PayPal's own identifiers.

The affiliate marketing industry operates primarily on "last click attribution" models that credit the final touchpoint before purchase. Content creators and publishers argue that browser extensions exploit this system by inserting themselves as the last touchpoint during checkout, effectively erasing previous affiliate referrals regardless of whether they provide value to consumers through discounts or coupon codes.

Honey's business model centers on automatically finding and applying coupon codes at checkout while users shop online. The extension monetizes through affiliate partnerships, earning commissions when users complete purchases through retailer links. PayPal acquired Honey for $4 billion in 2019, before the alleged commission diversion practices came to public attention.

Chrome Web Store data shows Honey declined from over 20 million users before the December 2024 investigation to 14 million users as of July 2025. The user exodus represents over 6 million departures following revelations about systematic affiliate commission diversion and limited coupon code access.

The original investigation by MegaLag documented three mechanisms through which Honey allegedly diverted commissions: direct replacement of affiliate tracking cookies, incentivized diversion through the "Honey Gold" rewards program, and commission capture through interface elements. In one test case, Honey diverted a $35 commission on a NordVPN purchase while providing the user with 89 cents worth of Honey Gold rewards points.

When Linus Media Group, one of Honey's largest promotional partners, discovered these practices and requested changes, Honey declined to modify the behavior according to email communications reviewed in the investigation. LMG subsequently terminated their partnership after approximately 160 sponsored segments that garnered 194 million views.

The December investigation also revealed that Honey targeted minors in advertising while leaking business codes. The extension added 146,000 online stores to its platform without their consent, representing over 80 percent of stores supported by the extension. This practice created what researchers characterized as economic coercion, where businesses faced ongoing revenue losses unless they agreed to partnership terms with PayPal.

For the digital marketing community, the Honey controversy highlights fundamental vulnerabilities in affiliate marketing attribution systems. The "last click attribution" model that enabled Honey's practices remains standard across most e-commerce platforms, creating potential for similar commission diversion schemes. Browser extensions have become increasingly important distribution channels for affiliate offers, providing convenience to consumers while generating substantial revenue through affiliate commissions and referral fees.

Marketing professionals must now consider browser extension interference when evaluating affiliate campaign performance and attribution accuracy. The technical mechanisms revealed through investigations demonstrate that extensions can manipulate attribution without detection by traditional compliance monitoring, particularly when selective standdown systems adjust behavior based on whether users represent legitimate shoppers or compliance testers.

Awin's statement emphasized that the company is "committed to enforcing its standards and using this moment to drive lasting improvements in transparency and accountability across the entire affiliate ecosystem." The network positioned the enforcement action as part of broader industry efforts to address systematic issues rather than focusing solely on one publisher.

The affiliate marketing industry faces ongoing challenges around transparency and attribution. Publishers often compete for the final click before purchase, sometimes through practices that advertisers view as interruptive or value-dilutive. Browser extensions in particular have faced scrutiny over their role in the customer journey, with questions about whether they truly influence purchase decisions or simply capture commissions by inserting affiliate links at the point of transaction.

Alternative affiliate networks exist, including CJ Affiliate and ShareASale, but replacing thousands of merchant relationships requires substantial business development effort. The loss of access to Impact.com, Rakuten Advertising, and potentially Awin represents a substantial operational disruption for Honey's business model, which depends on affiliate partnerships with major retail partners.

For Awin's retail partners and other publishers in the network, Honey's suspension could affect affiliate program performance in the short term. However, commission payments that previously went to Honey may be redistributed among other publishers in the network, including competing browser extensions, coupon sites, and cashback platforms.

Industry observers note that Awin's enforcement approach differs from other networks in its emphasis on remediation and collaboration alongside suspension. The commitment to working with Honey on source code verification, advertiser coupon management policies, and advance notification of technical changes suggests a framework for potential reinstatement if remediation measures meet network standards.

Whether this collaborative approach will satisfy critics who view the violations as fundamental fraud rather than technical policy breaches remains unclear. The debate reflects broader tensions in affiliate marketing between enforcement consistency, revenue considerations, and the practical challenges of managing large publisher networks with complex technical integrations.

The statement concludes by positioning strong enforcement and constructive industry collaboration as complementary rather than opposing approaches. "We believe strong enforcement, coupled with constructive industry collaboration, is essential to restoring trust and supporting long-term growth," Awin stated.

Timeline

Summary

Who: Awin Group (comprising Awin and Commission Factory), PayPal's Honey browser extension, content creators, affiliate marketers, and retail advertisers using affiliate programs.

What: Awin confirmed Honey violated publisher policies after investigation verified allegations of systematic affiliate commission diversion. The network suspended Honey's payments and access to new advertiser programs while requiring remediation including source code verification, advertiser coupon management policies, and advance notification of attribution changes.

When: Awin opened its formal investigation immediately after public allegations emerged in December 2024. The network announced confirmed policy violations and enforcement actions on January 21, 2026, with suspension measures remaining in place as of that date.

Where: The enforcement action affects Awin's global affiliate network operations. Awin Group operates across multiple markets serving advertisers and publishers worldwide, with the policy violations affecting publisher relationships and advertiser programs throughout the network's ecosystem.

Why: The enforcement responds to verified breaches of publisher policies involving affiliate commission diversion practices. Awin emphasized that strong enforcement coupled with constructive industry collaboration is essential to restoring trust and supporting long-term growth in affiliate marketing, positioning the action as part of broader efforts to improve transparency and accountability across the ecosystem.

Share this article
The link has been copied!