Criteo's testing of Google's Privacy Sandbox raises concerns about publisher revenue

Criteo's market testing of Google's Privacy Sandbox raises concerns about its effectiveness due to potential publisher revenue decline and a competitive advantage for Google.

Could the Sandbox, while promising user privacy, harbor negative consequences for publishers?
Could the Sandbox, while promising user privacy, harbor negative consequences for publishers?

Criteo last month examined the potential impact of Google's Privacy Sandbox on publishers' revenue if third-party cookies are deprecated. Their findings suggest significant financial drawbacks for publishers, prompting questions about the effectiveness of the Privacy Sandbox as a solution.

Publisher revenue could decline by up to 78% if third-party cookies are replaced with the current version of the Privacy Sandbox.

Even with Protected Audience API enabled, publishers might see a 60% drop in revenue.

Google Ad Manager (GAM) could capture a larger share of the market due to its dominance in Privacy Sandbox integration, potentially harming competition. Market share increase from 23% to 83% observed in the test.

Latency in ad delivery increases significantly, impacting user experience and potentially reducing monetization opportunities.

Methodology Strengths

Criteo's testing covered a vast scale, encompassing over 80% of their client campaigns, 18,000 advertisers, and 1,200 publishers.

They employed a rigorous approach to mitigate potential biases, including those arising from unlabeled traffic and third-party cookie usage in Mode B.

Constant performance across populations was maintained to accurately assess the long-term impact.

Mitigating Biases

Criteo highlights the importance of considering factors like unlabeled traffic and third-party cookie presence in Mode B to avoid skewed results.

Scoping results solely on Google Ad Manager can be misleading as it doesn't reflect the broader market impact.

The Road Ahead

Criteo believes there's still room for improvement in the Privacy Sandbox. They emphasize collaboration between the industry and Google to address limitations and ensure a sustainable solution that protects user privacy while safeguarding a healthy publisher ecosystem.

This study underscores the complexities involved in creating a viable alternative to third-party cookies. Balancing user privacy with a functional advertising market requires careful consideration of all stakeholders' needs. Further research and development are crucial to ensure a smooth transition for the open web.

Criteo's testing indicates a significant negative impact on publisher revenue with the current Privacy Sandbox (up to 78% decline), which aligns with the Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA) concerns. Both Criteo's findings and the CMA's investigation raise doubts about whether the Sandbox meets Google's commitment to minimize publisher revenue loss (capped at 5%). This reinforces the need for Google to address limitations in the Privacy Sandbox before full implementation to ensure a healthy and competitive advertising ecosystem that prioritizes user privacy without crippling publishers.


PPC Land is an international news publication headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. PPC Land delivers daily articles brimming with the latest news for marketing professionals of all experience levels.

Subscribe to our newsletter for just $10/year and get marketing news delivered straight to your inbox. By subscribing, you are supporting PPC Land.

You can also follow PPC Land on LinkedIn, Bluesky, Reddit, Mastodon, X, Facebook, Threads, and Google News.

Know more about us or contact us via info@ppc.land

Our latest marketing news:

Subscribe via email

Don’t miss out on the latest marketing news. Sign up now to get the articles directly in your email.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe