A new Adobe study published on January 27, 2026, lays out in uncomfortable detail the scale of the productivity problem facing marketing teams across the United States. Surveying 1,106 full-time employees with a 95% confidence level and a ±3% margin of error, the research paints a picture of professionals caught between rising output expectations and workflows that consistently fail them - a dynamic the marketing industry has watched worsen with each passing year.

The headline figure is stark. According to the Adobe study, 84% of marketers admit to working past their scheduled shifts, and 78% estimate they do so nearly five times a month. That translates, by Adobe's own calculations, to roughly 55 extra days of work per year for the average marketer. Tech workers lead even that alarming figure, putting in an average of 72 extra days annually.

But the volume of overtime alone does not capture the full picture. What makes these numbers particularly significant is where the time is going. According to the study, full-time US employees estimate they waste approximately 91 business days - or more than 18 weeks - annually on low-impact tasks such as administrative work, data entry, meeting scheduling, and internal reporting. For marketing specifically, that figure lands at 91 days per year, sitting between healthcare workers at 101 days and technology workers at 85. On-site workers, the study notes, spend 16% more time each year on these tasks than their remote counterparts, and are 53% more likely to cite coworker interruptions as their biggest barrier to productive work.

The finding connects directly to Adobe's broader research trajectory on marketing workloads. A May 2025 Adobe study found that marketers using AI save an average of 114 minutes weekly on content creation, translating to $3,520 per employee annually - suggesting the gap between current practices and automated ones carries real monetary weight.

Where productivity breaks down

The study identifies a specific set of obstacles that erode focus. According to Adobe, the number one driver of lost productivity across all surveyed employees is coworker interruptions or distractions, cited by 43% of respondents. For marketers specifically, the picture shifts slightly: unclear priorities top the list at 39%, followed by coworker interruptions at 37%, and context switching between too many tasks or projects at 36%.

The variance by industry matters here. Finance workers cite coworker interruptions as their primary barrier at 48%, matching healthcare workers exactly. Retail employees are even more affected, with 51% pointing to the same issue. Technology workers, meanwhile, are most likely to flag poorly spaced meetings (35%) as their core problem. Marketers are the only sector surveyed where unclear priorities - a structural, organizational failing rather than an environmental one - sit at the top of the list. This detail deserves attention: the challenge for marketing teams is less about physical environment and more about how work is planned and prioritized before it reaches the individual.

That planning gap carries consequences that extend beyond productivity metrics. According to Adobe's research, project management issues have caused workplace stress for more than half (56%) of marketers. Even more striking: nearly one in three marketers surveyed - 32% - has left a job specifically because of poor work management. Women are 50% more likely than men to have done so, according to the study. These are not abstract dissatisfactions. They translate directly into talent retention failures and recruitment costs that organizations often do not directly attribute to workflow dysfunction.

The staffing implications fit a pattern PPC Land has tracked across the industry's adoption of AI, where organizations facing pressure to scale output have begun creating dedicated automation roles rather than simply asking existing teams to absorb more.

The automation gap

The data on automation reveals a specific and measurable shortfall. According to Adobe's January 2026 study, marketers currently automate only 18% of their daily tasks. But when asked how much of their work could theoretically be automated, they estimate another 29% - nearly a third of their total workload - is suitable for automation but remains manually handled. This creates what Adobe frames as a significant opportunity: nearly half of all marketing tasks could potentially be automated, yet less than a fifth currently are.

Marketing tops the industry rankings for AI adoption among the sectors surveyed, with 18% of tasks automated. Technology follows at 16%, and finance at 13%. Still, the gap between current automation (18%) and perceived potential (47%, combining current plus additional 29%) is substantial. Among workers already using AI in work management, nearly three in four - 73% - report higher productivity compared with the previous year. One in six employees who do not use any work management products report a drop in productivity over the same period.

Those numbers land against a backdrop where Adobe expanded GenStudio in October 2025 with custom AI models and integrations across Amazon Ads, Google Marketing Platform, LinkedIn, and TikTok - a platform positioned specifically to address the content creation bottleneck the new study documents. The earlier Adobe launch of AI agents for enterprise customer experience automation in September 2025 reflected the same underlying analysis: that fragmented tools and manual handoffs are the primary structural drag on marketing team performance.

The unified workflow case

The study makes a direct quantitative case for unified workflow systems. According to Adobe's research, employees estimate a more integrated work system could save them an average of 38 extra days per year - a figure the research team derived from self-reported estimates of time currently lost to fragmented processes. Nearly three in four marketers agree a unified workflow system would improve their work-life balance. Among technology workers, that figure rises to 83%; among hospitality workers, it falls to 71%.

The potential for stress reduction is similarly substantial. According to respondents, streamlining workflows could cut overall work stress by nearly 50%. Among marketers specifically, 54% say a unified workflow system would reduce their stress - the highest figure across any sector in the study. Finance workers follow at 53%, healthcare at 49%, and hospitality at 45%.

Pain points with current work management tools reveal what employees find most deficient. Poor integration with other tools tops the list at 33%. Confusing or complex workflows follow at 28%, insufficient training at 24%, and lack of AI or automation capabilities at 21%. Difficulty tracking project progress and a non-user-friendly interface each register at 21% and 20% respectively. The absence of a single, unified platform across teams is cited by 19%, while limited reporting or analytics features register at 18%.

What employees want from a work management solution breaks down clearly. Increased overall efficiency is the top priority at 49%. Significant time savings follow at 44%. Reduced work-related stress or burnout is cited by 30%, task automation capabilities by 27%, improved project visibility and tracking by 24%, and improved collaboration by 22%. Greater focus on high-value, strategic work matters to 21%, and enhanced decision-making through better data to 18%.

The industry and seniority dimensions

The study does not treat the workforce as a monolith. Significant variation exists by job level. According to Adobe, senior leaders are 22% more likely than entry-level employees to face coworker interruptions. Entry-level staff, meanwhile, are 50% more likely to report inefficient workflows as their primary challenge - a finding that suggests organizations are systematically failing newer employees with processes that demand more manual effort than experienced workers encounter.

The stress dimension varies by sector in ways that reflect the different rhythms of each industry. Finance employees are the most likely to experience work management-related stress, at 61%. Healthcare workers are the least, at 40% - though healthcare loses the most time of any sector to low-impact tasks, at 101 days per year. The disconnect between time lost and stress reported suggests that stress is shaped not just by volume of work but by the nature of the organizational pressures surrounding it.

On-site workers occupy a particularly pressured position. Beyond spending 16% more time on low-impact tasks than remote workers, they are 82% more likely to struggle with collaboration - a counterintuitive finding given that physical co-location is often assumed to simplify working together. The friction, Adobe's data implies, comes not from geography but from the absence of coherent systems for managing work regardless of where it takes place.

PPC Land has covered how marketers are already under structural content pressure, with executives from companies including Jacquard and Funnel identifying content creation - not data - as the primary operational bottleneck entering 2026. The Adobe study's findings on time lost to administrative work add a second layer: even before content creation begins, marketing teams are losing nearly a quarter of each working year to tasks that exist below the strategic waterline.

Research methodology and scope

Adobe conducted the survey through the Adobe for Business team, gathering responses from 1,106 full-time employees across the United States. The study provides a 95% confidence level with a ±3% margin of error. The research covers multiple sectors including marketing, technology, finance, healthcare, education, hospitality, and retail. As Adobe notes in its methodology statement, results may reflect personal perceptions and experiences that could differ from actual behavior - a standard caveat for self-reported research, but one worth keeping in mind when interpreting the productivity day estimates in particular.

The study was published on January 27, 2026, as part of Adobe's broader research into workplace productivity, and the PR summary was distributed to media on February 19, 2026. Adobe's separate October 2025 consumer research showed that content demands on marketing teams are simultaneously intensifying from the outside - consumers expect twice-weekly brand touchpoints across most channels, with social and SMS pushing toward three times weekly. The internal productivity data and the external content demand data together describe a scissors dynamic: workloads expanding while the organizational infrastructure to support them lags.

Adobe's 2026 creative trends forecast, released in late 2025, noted that nearly two-thirds of marketers believe content demand will grow by at least five times between now and 2026. That projection makes the productivity findings from the January 2026 study considerably more pointed: if 18% automation is generating 91 days of wasted time now, the same structural gaps at five times the content volume would represent an organizational crisis without parallel in modern marketing operations.

Timeline

Summary

Who: Adobe for Business, surveying 1,106 full-time US employees across marketing, technology, finance, healthcare, education, hospitality, and retail sectors. The findings are directly relevant to marketing professionals, HR leaders, and enterprise technology buyers.

What: A proprietary productivity study revealing that 84% of marketers work past scheduled hours, employees lose the equivalent of 91 business days per year to low-impact tasks, 32% of marketers have left jobs because of poor work management, and only 18% of tasks are currently automated despite employees believing 47% could be. The research also finds that a unified workflow system could save an average of 38 days per year and reduce work stress by nearly 50%, according to respondents.

When: The study was published on January 27, 2026, and covered in media distribution on February 19, 2026. The research reflects conditions as of late 2025 and early 2026.

Where: The survey covers full-time employees in the United States across multiple industries and work settings, including on-site and remote workers. The findings apply to enterprise organizations using fragmented work management tools across physical and distributed team environments.

Why: Adobe positioned the research as evidence for the operational case behind unified work management platforms, particularly as content demands on marketing teams are projected to grow fivefold by 2026. The productivity gap between current automation rates and perceived automation potential - 18% actual versus 47% possible - represents the core argument: that the tools exist to close the gap, but adoption has not yet matched organizational need.

Share this article
The link has been copied!